[Nautilus-list] Re: what "must" be done for gnome 2.0?

[David Fallon <davef tetsubo com>]

On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 23:32, Darin Adler wrote:
> On 3/6/02 10:33 PM, "David Fallon" <davef tetsubo com> wrote:
> 
> > Can I get some clarity on what "must" be done for gnome 2.0?
> 
> Here's my formulation, roughly from most important to least:
> 
>     #1: Crashes doing normal stuff
>     #2: Slowness doing normal stuff
>     #3: Things that are worse than they were in 1.X -- new bug or feature
> lost in the translation
>     #4: Crashes doing unusual stuff
>     #5: Any other egregious problems that were present in 1.X but would be
> an embarrassment to the entire Gnome project if left broken

Okay, excellent. How do I then prioritize these appropriately in
bugzillla? Or would you prefer the lists I've sent out?

-- 

dave