Re: PATCH: Bug 80380
- From: Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>
- To: Frank Worsley <fworsley shaw ca>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org, jfleck inkstain net, eugene oconnor sun com
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Bug 80380
- Date: 25 Jun 2002 15:10:09 -0400
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 14:44, Frank Worsley wrote:
> > Changes the button ordering of the run display dialog to
> > [display][cancel][run] so that it is hig compliant (run is the
> > affirmative, cancel the negative and display is the alternative in case
> > anyone was wondering). Still need to add mneumonics, but these
> > constitute string changes, so we can leave them till later.
>
> I was just about to commit my patch (for 2.0.x) which adds a "Run in
> terminal" button to that dialog. Before I do that I guess I will
> rearrange the buttons to be in the correct order:
>
> [Display] [Cancel] [Run in terminal] [Run]
Not totally sure. I based the button order on
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/draft_hig/alert-windows.html#alert-button-order
My initial guess is
[Display][Run in terminal][Cancel][Run]
Since button ordering is supposed to be
[alternative][negative][affirmative], So I would consider Display and
run in terminal to both be alternative actions.
I'm not completely sure about capitalization, but grazing through the
hig, it seems like "Run in Terminal" is correct.
dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]