Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome (fwd)
- From: Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
- To: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome (fwd)
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:31:44 +0000 (GMT)
D'uh... broken mailclients suck, but well, nautilus orignally was
included in this discussion - so long:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:26:12 +0000 (GMT)
From: Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
To: Chipzz <chipzz ULYSSIS Org>
Cc: James Henstridge <james daa com au>,
"desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Chipzz wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, James Henstridge wrote:
>
> > From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
> > Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
> >
> > Things like gconfd-2 should probably be under $(prefix)/libexec, as
> > should the majority of the out of process bonobo components that should
> > not be executed directly (ie. they are activated specially by a library
> > or another process). Not so sure about the control panels, as they
> > _are_ directly callable.
> >
> > James.
>
> Yes, but no sane person should execute them directly. And those who do
> want to, can always put the dir in their PATH. I think it would be a
> good thing to reduce the number of gnome binaries in $prefix/bin. That
> is, only have actual programs that the average user would execute from
> the command line (a category which I don't think capplets fall in).
Yes, they would be easy enough to find in something like
$libdir/gnome/capplets. If we insist on being able to call them from the
commandline by default we could fix our install scripts to create a files
called /etc/profile.d/gnome.c?sh to fixup the paths.
Another class of binaries that should go to $libexec/gnome would
be Nautilus views and other
Ciao,
Mathias
PS: Appears like the the headers generated by your mail client are broken.
PINE (and I) had no chance to detect _automatically_ why a reply-to-all
should include desktop-devel-list gnome org into the lists of
reciptents...
--
WWW: http://taschenorakel.de/mathias/
PGP/GnuPG: 1024-Bit DSA: ID 55E572F3, 1024-Bit RSA: ID EAAF7CF1
"e:-1" is the Slashdot Troll Emoticon. Often seen after the word "Scor"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]