Re: [Nautilus-list] performance and usability



On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 09:14, James Mitchell Allmond wrote:
> I did see the Nautilus2/Gnome 2.0 post but that still isn't good enough.
> It's certainly a nice improvement but much more is needed for nautilus
> to become a reasonable file browser. I'm not trying to be mean or
> hateful towards the developers but I am trying to lay out the plain
> truth.

I think everyone on this list is aware that Nautilus has to get a lot
more responsive in a number of areas. I don't think this is a case
where people haven't been aware of "the plain truth" or have been 
choosing to ignore it.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]