Re: [Nautilus-list] New document icons
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Ben FrantzDale <bfrantzdale hmc edu>
- Cc: Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, Nautilus <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] New document icons
- Date: 22 Jan 2002 17:48:20 -0800
On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 12:02, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 14:05, Darin Adler wrote:
> > On 1/20/02 5:03 AM, "Seth Nickell" <snickell stanford edu> wrote:
> > > Tigert & Jimmac have been busy and have at long last finished a
> > > replacement set for the original GMC stock icons we still use for (most)
> > > document type icons in Nautilus. I'd like to replace most of the
> > > document icons with the new document icons.
> > >
> > > See: http://primates.ximian.com/~tigert/new_stock_project/
> > >
> > > Almost with exception I prefer the new document icons to the old gmc
> > > icons. However, there are some issues raised about possibly replacing a
> > > few of the newer "eazel" icons such as i-spreadsheet.png and i-music.png
> > > with generic versions that are consistent with the new document icons.
> > > (I don't have generic icons for these yet, only specific versions for
> > > Gnumeric, but I suspect that they would be pretty easy to create).
> > Which theme are we talking about here?
> > > 1) Is it OK if I replace the gnome-*.png icons in nautilus/icons with
> > > the new document icons?
> > Sure.
> I'm curious, how large are the icons you guys made? I thought, to be
> viewable at 400% and full quality, icons need to be 194x194 pixels.
All Tuomas' current icons except for regular and music are at the
"normal" size. He's willing to do a number of the more common ones in a
range of sizes, so I'm making up a list of the more important/common
document types that should have multiple sizes done.
] [Thread Prev