Re: [Nautilus-list] changes to svg icon handling

[Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On 25 Feb 2002, Michael Meeks wrote:

> 
> On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 16:15, Darin Adler wrote:
> > I think this is the right approach, but I don't see why a single max_size
> 
> 	Also, when I tried this approach it resulted in not only dramatically
> shrunk images, but very curious layout, especially with emblems ( which
> I use quite a bit for testing ). Somehow, a factor of two seemed to make
> it behave as I expected this; this seemed to be related to the
> difference between size->nominal_width (as passed to load_specific_icon)
> and size->maximum_width which seems to be rather disparate. It would be
> good to know which to aim for, since we produce a file of exactly this
> size.

See my other mail about the situation.
 
> > > Hmmm. I don't seem to see in-icon text at all. Does it work for you?
> > 
> > I don't see in-icon text either, because the icons for plain text files
> > don't seem to have embedded text rectangles in any of the icon themes I
> > have. We probably need to fix this.
> 
> 	I see it fine - the problem (for me) was that I had a default
> gnome-text-plain.png lying around that was clobbering the use of
> i-regular.svg for text files, which in turn was clobbering the use of
> i-regular.xml's text layout information.
> 
> 	Simply deleting ${prefix}/share/pixmaps/nautilus/
> 
> 	gnome-text-plain.png, and I think default/gnome-text-plain
> 
> 	or somesuch stuff made it work - the same thing was yielding me pixmaps
> for text files even when using an svg theme - I've no idea how those
> files got there, or what changed, since it always used to work well.

Sounds plausible, I also get bitmapped text icons. I'll try this.

/ alex