Re: [Nautilus-list] large file sizes not showing up
- From: Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, "Brian J. Murrell" <1dd1f6272992094c77dca88ebab93b4f interlinx bc ca>
- Cc: Nautilus <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] large file sizes not showing up
- Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 12:38:16 -0800
On 2/9/02 11:17 AM, "Owen Taylor" <otaylor redhat com> wrote:
> "Brian J. Murrell" <1dd1f6272992094c77dca88ebab93b4f interlinx bc ca> writes:
>
>> Now it's obvious that __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 needs to be defined and that
>> it is not being done in my (distro's) build of gnomevfs. Should it be
>> normally? Is there something in the "configure" of gnomevfs to turn
>> on 64 bit (large) file handling?
>
> I believe the correct define for GLIBC is:
>
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
>
> You could report a bug report to your vendor that they should compile
> gnome-vfs with this define (We add this to a lot of packages, but
> probably not gnome-vfs), and/or file a bug report against gnome-vfs
> that it should do this automatically for the right systems. (Hopefully
> there aren't systems that pay attention to _FILE_OFFSET_BITS but don't
> work correctly with it set...)
I've already dealt with this in the latter fashion for gnome-vfs HEAD:
<http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsquery.cgi?module=gnome-vfs&branch=HEAD&branc
htype=match&dir=gnome-vfs&file=&filetype=match&who=darin&whotype=match&sortb
y=Date&hours=&date=explicit&mindate=02%2F09%2F02+12%3A02&maxdate=02%2F09%2F0
2+12%3A04&cvsroot=%2Fcvs%2Fgnome>
But the discussion continued in the gnome-vfs list rather than here.
-- Darin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]