Re: [Nautilus-list] Eel patch
- From: Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>
- To: Michael Myburgh <Michael Myburgh Sun COM>
- Cc: Nautilus <nautilus-list lists eazel com>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Eel patch
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:53:06 -0700
on 9/19/01 8:11 AM, Michael Myburgh at Michael Myburgh Sun COM wrote:
> Has anyone considered that the implementations are time-consuming?
> Would it not be easier to mmap the file? This would result in just
> about NO reading except for memory page sized chunks that are
> actually accessed by the application. If the application wants to
> update the file, then mmapping is more efficient as well. By the
> way, my experience of mmap is on Solaris, and I'm assuming that
> Linux's implementation is entirely compatible.
When the file is known to be on the local filesystem and you know that you
are running on a platform that supports mmap, then a mmap could be the best
way to get at the file contents. In that case, there's no need to use the
Eel read_entire_file function. The function we are discussing here is a
gnome-vfs extension that works for any URI that gnome-vfs can handle.
Your comments are definitely something to consider for someone deciding what
function to use, but they have no direct bearing on the implementation of
this Eel function.
-- Darin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]