Re: [Nautilus-list] continued redhat merge

Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com> writes: 
> I have since realized that "historical" Nautilus link files are still needed
> for things like the trash file on the desktop. It would be great if someone
> changed it so that wasn't true, or made the trash use a .desktop file
> instead (with a suitable additional key in the .desktop file, I guess). But
> anyway, calling it "historical" might be premature if we still need it for
> more than just compatibility.

I don't think this is the case, at least, in the Red Hat branch I get
desktop entries not nautilus link files for home/trash. Maybe we lost
this patch?

We didn't want to create any of the old nautilus link files in what we


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]