[Nautilus-list] Re: help browser plan
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- To: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, gnome-doc-list gnome org, usability gnome org, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, nautilus-list eazel com
- Subject: [Nautilus-list] Re: help browser plan
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:57:14 -0800
On 26Nov2001 09:22PM (-0500), Alex Larsson wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> >
> > Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes:
> > > Right now, the top 3 candidates, mozilla, gtkhtml1 and gtkhtml2, all
> > > sound like they won't be ready in time.
> > >
> >
> > Well, there are two mitigating factors for help browser:
> >
> > - the lib doesn't need to be API/ABI frozen, it can be "internal"
> > - it only needs to display our usual DocBook output, it doesn't have
> > to handle arbitrary web pages
>
> Yes. This leads me to belive that GtkHTML2 is an excellent choice. It is
> already ported to gtk+ 2 (was written for it even), and it already handles
> many web pages, so I don't think the DocBook output will be any problem.
>
> GtkHtml1 needs porting to Gnome 2, and Mozilla needs porting to Gtk2 if it
> is to be embedded.
Sounds good to me, but someone should clear this with the gtkhtml2 maintainers.
> > Shipping sans help browser isn't an option really (though using the
> > one in Nautilus is an option, I'm not sure it makes things easier).
>
> There will be no nautilus one unless someone ports Mozilla to gtk 2, or
> someone ports bonobo 2 to gtk 1.2.
>
Or someone writes a GtkHTML2 nautilus view (probably the easiest of
the three options).
Regards,
Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]