[Nautilus-list] Re: help browser plan
- From: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, <usability gnome org>, <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>, <nautilus-list eazel com>
- Subject: [Nautilus-list] Re: help browser plan
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:22:15 -0500 (EST)
On 26 Nov 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org> writes:
> > Right now, the top 3 candidates, mozilla, gtkhtml1 and gtkhtml2, all
> > sound like they won't be ready in time.
> >
>
> Well, there are two mitigating factors for help browser:
>
> - the lib doesn't need to be API/ABI frozen, it can be "internal"
> - it only needs to display our usual DocBook output, it doesn't have
> to handle arbitrary web pages
Yes. This leads me to belive that GtkHTML2 is an excellent choice. It is
already ported to gtk+ 2 (was written for it even), and it already handles
many web pages, so I don't think the DocBook output will be any problem.
GtkHtml1 needs porting to Gnome 2, and Mozilla needs porting to Gtk2 if it
is to be embedded.
> Shipping sans help browser isn't an option really (though using the
> one in Nautilus is an option, I'm not sure it makes things easier).
There will be no nautilus one unless someone ports Mozilla to gtk 2, or
someone ports bonobo 2 to gtk 1.2.
/ Alex
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]