[Nautilus-list] Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.
- From: Jakub Steiner <jimmac ximian com>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- Cc: nautilus-list eazel com, mc gnome org, prion-me-harder ximian com
- Subject: [Nautilus-list] Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.
- Date: 23 May 2001 12:05:59 +0200
On 22 May 2001 20:23:38 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> Currently when people download executables from the network, say for
> installing software, they can not execute them because the execute bit
> is not set.
>
> So typical installation instructions for a Unix application look like
> this:
>
> 1. Click on this link to download.
> 2. Run a shell
> 3. type chmod +x file
> 4. Run
As has been already mentioned, nautilus has a way how to change perms without launching a shell (I bet gmc has too, dunno). I'm surprised by the number of positive responses to this idea. IMHO this is a small good for usability and a big security drawback. A lot of trojan horses will pop-up once there is such a feature in an end-user app like a file manager. Users that won't be able to set the execute bit won't be able to recognise the risks of clicking on a See-Miguel-Naked icon ;)
Every "will linux email clients be threatened by melissa-like worms?" article ends with "we have the execute bit 'security'". I vote for not having this feature implemented...
Jakub
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]