Re: [Nautilus-list] Why do Trilobite v1.0.3 andNautilus-suggestedv1.0.3 require modutils v2.3.21!
- From: Miles Lane <miles megapathdsl net>
- To: Darin Adler <darin eazel com>
- Cc: Nautilus <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Why do Trilobite v1.0.3 andNautilus-suggestedv1.0.3 require modutils v2.3.21!
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 14:26:46 -0700
Darin Adler wrote:
>
> on 5/9/01 1:54 PM, Miles Lane at miles megapathdsl net wrote:
>
> > ARGGGH!
> >
> > I uninstalled modutils 2.4.3 and installed modutils 2.3.21
> > and I STILL get the error from eazel-installer.
> >
> > This is a freshly downloaded eazel-installer (build 2159)
> > that I am using. I tried running:
> >
> > sh ./eazel-installer-rpm3.sh --debug --force
> >
> > But I still got the following errors:
> >
> > * trilobite v1.0.3 requires modutils v2.3.21,
> > which could not be found on the server
> > * nautilus-suggested v1.0.3 requires modutils
> > v2.3.21, which could not be found on the server
> >
> > Please help!
>
> The RPM spec file for trilobite does not mention modutils at all. I assume
> this is a problem with some other package that is required by trilobite
> depending on modutils. I wonder which one.
>
> Note that this is an Eazel software catalog issue, not a Nautilus issue.
I have another question, which may be related. I have Redhat 6.2, but I
have upgraded to Ximian Gnome 1.4, which installs RPM 4.0. Does the
eazel-installer-rpm3 only understand RPM 3.x rpm databases? I have been
using the rpm3 installer, since that's what I'm told to do for my
distribution. I just tried the rpm4 installer, but was told that my
distribution was incompatible and to use the rpm3 installer. Am I
screwed?
Thanks,
Miles
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]