Re: [Nautilus-list] [Fwd: help making librsvg and eel stay out of the way of GNOME 1 versions]
- From: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>
- Cc: <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] [Fwd: help making librsvg and eel stay out of the way of GNOME 1 versions]
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:24:40 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Ramiro Estrugo wrote:
> The changes mentioned on the forwarded mail mean that you have to
> rebuild librsvg, eel, and nautilus on either the stable branch (gnome1)
> or CVS HEAD (gnome2).
>
> As usual, 'rebuild' using eazel-hacking will do all the work.
>
> I suggest you do a clobber build just so that old cruft will be out of
> the way.
This part is no good:
diff -u -p -r1.24.4.3 -r1.24
--- eel/Makefile.am 2001/07/26 08:35:23 1.24.4.3
+++ eel/Makefile.am 2001/06/05 01:13:55 1.24
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ INCLUDES = \
$(NULL)
libeel_la_LDFLAGS = \
- -version-info @EEL_VERSION_INFO@ \
$(EEL_DEPENDENCY_LIBS) \
$(NULL)
Since this was not specified before we got libeel.so.0, with this you get
libeel.so.1 and libeel.so.1.0.1. That breaks binary compat.
/ Alex
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]