RE: [Nautilus-list] The screenshots made me think....

[Steve Homer <shomer mondello toronto fmco com>]

> Mattias Eriksson <snaggen acc umu se> writes:
> 
> > On 31 Jan 2001 01:35:03 -0800, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > > I once again challenge you to tell me what the hell "looks like
> GNOME"
> > > means. 
> > 
> > I dont want a flame war, I dont thing those kind of debates leed any
> > where.... so dont interpret my mails as flames, they are not ment to
> be
> > that. With this said I'll go and answer your question.
> > 
> > With a gnome look I mean things like using gnome stockbuttons by
> > default, using system fonts by default and such things.
> 
> Nautilus supports antialiased fonts and uses them by default. GNOME
> does not support them at all in general, so we can't use the GNOME
> font setting when using AA fonts, just a close approximation. This is
> why you won't get the exact system font for all things when in
> antialiased (AKA smooth graphics) mode.
> 
> > And I dont want to be rude to any employers at eazel, I think they
> have
> > been doing a great job so far. But I still think it's important not to
> > trade a default gnome look just go get this single app looking better,
> > because I must say that it's looking good. I just want to point out
> that
> > it might be an idea to improve the gnome stockbuttons so that those
> > might be better looking and then use them by default.
> 
> The GNOME stock buttons are not themable and many people would object
> to replacing the current one. Ours are themable, and again, if you
> want the exact gnome look, you can easily get it by picking the right
> theme.
> 
> For GNOME 2, we hope to make toolbar buttons and such themable
> gnome-wide.
> 
>  - Maciej

Sounds great! Will the AA problem in Nautilus (and GNOME in general) be
solved using the new X patches in GTK/GNOME 2.0?



_______________________________________________
Nautilus-list mailing list
Nautilus-list lists eazel com
http://lists.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list