[Nautilus-list] Re: Installation-time performerance preference
- From: Michael Rogers <banthafodder connectfree co uk>
- To: Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Christian Meyer <chrisime uni de>, nautilus-list eazel com, usability gnome org
- Subject: [Nautilus-list] Re: Installation-time performerance preference
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:22:28 +0100
Christian Rose wrote:
>
> -- GNOME desktop performerance --------------
> The GNOME desktop has default preferences that will fit most types of
> modern computer hardware. However, if you are installing on an older
> system with less resources, more restrictive defaults may be a better
> alternative.
>
> [ ] Restrictive - Specially targeted for systems with
> limited memory and computing power, typically an older
> computer
> [*] Default - Targeted for most systems
>
> ---------------------------------------------
Perhaps this decision could be automated by running benchmarks at
install time? X server performance (time to map a window, client-server
round-trip time, colour depth and screen resolution); amount of RAM (can
libgtop find this out?); CPU performance; filesystem performance in
$HOME. Different versions of documentation could be installed to match
the look and feel chosen by/for the user (eg if icons in menus have been
switched off to save RAM, screenshots should not show icons in menus).
Michael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]