RE: [Nautilus-list] De-Lurk, Hello, Question: Roadmap?
- From: "Ryan Muldoon" <rpmuldoon students wisc edu>
- To: "Darin Adler" <darin bentspoon com>, "Aaron Weber" <aaron ximian com>
- Cc: <nautilus-list lists eazel com>
- Subject: RE: [Nautilus-list] De-Lurk, Hello, Question: Roadmap?
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:11:38 -0500
I'd be interested in helping out with some roadmap-type things, or other
tasks that don't require a hacking setup.....My plans for hacking on
nautilus this summer have been thwarted by a dead home computer, so I am
stuck with a windows machine at work. But I have some spare time to devote
to nautilus if that is useful to anyone. I'm hoping that I can do some
hacking once I buy a new home machine, but I'd still like to contribute
somehow.
--Ryan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nautilus-list-admin lists eazel com
> [mailto:nautilus-list-admin lists eazel com]On Behalf Of Darin Adler
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:18 AM
> To: Aaron Weber
> Cc: nautilus-list lists eazel com
> Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] De-Lurk, Hello, Question: Roadmap?
>
>
> On Monday, August 6, 2001, at 08:39 AM, Aaron Weber wrote:
>
> > Is there a roadmap for Nautilus 2.0 anywhere?
>
> No.
>
> > If not, should we develop one?
>
> Can't see any reason not to.
>
> Currently, the only concrete plans for Nautilus are to port to GNOME 2. I
> was planning to call this Nautilus 1.2, but maybe it should be called 2.0
> just to reduce confusion about GNOME 1 vs. 2. Just getting over
> to the new
> versions of libraries for GNOME 2 is a lot of work in itself.
> Besides that,
> we are just "following our noses", dealing with problems as they are
> reported and all of that.
>
> Andy has some other things he's working on, so we should get those into a
> road map.
>
> If we had some more volunteers, then a more ambitious road map would be
> nice to have.
>
> > In bugzilla, the bug targets go up to 1.0 or so, and then "Future" ...
> > so it seems like at least we should have some sort of decision about
> > what "future" means. :>
>
> Yes. The idea there is that we notice new bugs by the fact that they have
> no milestone set. A milestone set to Future means that we decided at some
> point that they weren't for 1.0.
>
> The top priority for Bugzilla right now is actually moving the bugs to
> bugzilla.gnome.org, which is why I haven't done anything about this yet.
>
> I personally am going to make the bug moving (and dealing with
> the various
> incoming patches) my top priority and then work on something like a road
> map once that's done. But that shouldn't stop you from making
> some kind of
> road map sooner.
>
> -- Darin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nautilus-list mailing list
> Nautilus-list lists eazel com
> http://lists.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]