Re: [Nautilus-list] Directory change signals?
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: David Bishop <david bishop dhs org>
- Cc: karlheg bittersweet inetarena com, snickell stanford edu, nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Directory change signals?
- Date: 10 Sep 2000 18:52:27 -0700
David Bishop <david bishop dhs org> writes:
> My email has been broken for a day, so I don't know if this has already been
> brought up, but fam the user-space daemon can be combined with "imon" to do
> exactly what you guys are talking about. Fam, buy itself, does not require
> any kernel changed at all, and does, in fact, monitor the entire file system
> (not just specifcally requested ones). If kernel level support is not
> implemented, it falls back to a polling mode, so that any *nix can run fam.
> However, if you are running linux, you can install the imon patch that allows
> any file-system changes to be reported directly to fam, and from there to
> your program (nautilus, efm, whatever). The reason I bring up efm
> (Englitenment's file manager) is because that is exactly what they are using,
> and it works great. They have people on solaris, freebsd (that's be me!),
> and of course linux, all of which can run it, and get the benefits of real-
> time or very-close-to-real-time updates. As is mentioned below this, fam and
> imon are available from sgi, and I would highly recommend talking to some sgi
> and enlightenment folks regarding how it works and where they see the
> development going. To sum up: fam doesn't *require* a kernel patch, though it
> runs better with one, and as such it is defintely worth a close inspection.
>
David,
We've already looked at fam/imon, and are very seriously considering
using them for a future release of Nautilus. However, we decided we
didn't have time to put it in for 1.0.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]