Re: [Nautilus-list] Bug buddy
- From: eskil eazel com
- To: Ben FrantzDale <bfrantzdale hmc edu>
- Cc: Nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Bug buddy
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:53:55 -0800
Ben FrantzDale wrote:
> > We'd like to have bug buddy work with Nautilus. But the current bug buddy
> > results in a lot of backtraces with minimal additional comments -- not what
> > I really consider bug reports.
>
> How do you figure? Bug buddy has a full comment field just like any other bug
> report would...
We "figure", based on previous experience with bugbuddy from other gnome
projects that some of us maintain. Bug buddy makes it too easy to just click
"next" a few time, optionally enter ``it crashed when I clicked`` in description
and ``asdadffasdfsa`` in comment in the belief that the stacktrace is good
enough.
Basically, bugbuddy does not make it painfull enough to file bugreports.
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]