Re: [Nautilus-list] Status...
- From: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>
- Cc: nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Status...
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 14:43:14 +0000
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> That's true. I was imagining a Delete feature as just like rm,
> i.e. not undoable. If it were undoable, it would be sort of like
> putting the item in the trash only invisible, which seems rather
> confusing UI-wise. In particular, there'd be no way to ensrue the item
> is permanently gone, if you can always Undo a Delete.
Yes, come to think of it, I'd never actually tried to Undo a permanent
delete on Windows, for example... and you can't, which sort of makes
sense. The trashcan *is* the Undo feature for deletes... which you
could argue is sort of confusing in itself-- why should Undo-ing a
delete be any different from undoing anything else? But we can debate
that one some other time :o)
> The Trash approach is definitely better
> than having a confirmation dialog each time you try to delete.
Yes, I agree. Windows only lets you bypass the trashcan by using the
Shift+Delete shortcut, rather than Delete on its own... there's no way
to do it using the mouse/menus. That perhaps isn't such a bad way to do
it, if you really wanted to-- it's certainly not something you're likely
to do by mistake.
BTW, we really need a UK+Eire-localised version... nobody calls them
"trashcans" over here :o)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson ireland sun com Desktop Engineering Group
http://www.sun.ie +353 1 819 9771
"La perfection est atteinte non quand il ne reste rien à ajouter, mais
quand il ne reste rien à enlever." -- A. de St.Exupery
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]