Re: [Nautilus-list] Tree View
- From: Ben FrantzDale <bfrantzdale hmc edu>
- To: Arlo Rose <arlo eazel com>
- Cc: nautilus-list lists eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Tree View
- Date: 05 Nov 2000 21:58:11 +0500
> Hi Ty,
>
> I'd like to take a moment to address your points as a Human Interface
> designer who has indeed done user testing in this area.
>
>
> > 1. the tree view is be definition a navigation gui
> > component. including files in the tree view doesn't
> > make any sense. if it did, user testing would have
> > told use so years ago. and by your thoughts gui
> > designers would have put tree views on both sides of
> > the splitter :)
>
> User testing does indeed show that showing files in the tree view is
> important. In a recent study done at Eazel, we found that users looked to
> the tree view as a place to get a files from other folders when another
> window is not available.
That makes sense...
> Also, keep in mind that other platforms use tree views extensively, and have
> always shown files and folders together.
For what it's worth, I'm quite sure that Windows' tree view only has
directories in it.
> Finally, the reason we don't have our list view be a tree view, is purely
> due to time constraints. Upcoming versions of Nautilus will feature a fully
> hierarchical list view.
Cool.
> > 2. there is no or little value add to including files
> > in the tree view other than cluttering the view.
>
> The value added is that a user can get to a file from a directory that
> they're not currently in. This means that while they're buried in some
> directory, they can easily access any file they have permissions for and
> copy, view, open, edit, or delete it... without having to physically go to
> that directory to perform those actions.
I see the point but I keep finding the Nautilus tree view to be hard to use
because it is so cluttered with files... As soon as I am a few directories I
have to scroll to the right (manually) then scroll down to where I'm going...
it just doesn't seem smooth yet...
It seems as though there is a lot of emphasis on making things easy to
learn even when they will be kludgy to use in the long run. This seems
to be an example of this. I hope there will be enough configurability so taht
those of us who don't mind putting effort into learning to use the system can
be rewarded with a system that truly is easy to use.
--Ben
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]