Re: [Muine] Xine vs. Gstreamer
- From: Mike Douglas <code_monkey gooeylinux org>
- To: muine-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Muine] Xine vs. Gstreamer
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:44:23 -0700
from http://advogato.org/person/jorn/
"I have recently changed Muine's default backend from GStreamer to xine-
lib. I am a big fan of the whole GStreamer project and I intend to
switch back as soon as I think it is ready- however, I don't think it is
quite there yet. I hope better performance (especially when opening a
new stream), reliable seeking, and a more responsive, non-crackly pause
are on the agenda for GNOME 2.8."
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 21:58 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:
> Based on a discussion in #archlinux I had about the xine vs. gstreamer
> backend question, I now pose this to the list: why was xine selected
> over gstreamer? What features does xine provide that gstreamer doesn't?
> Is xine just more stable? The results will determine whether Arch
> Linux's muine package is xine-enabled or gstreamer-enabled, so be
> opinionated. Unless you want to support some users who's muine is
> compiled against the lesser of the two backends.
> Cheers, Link
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]