Re: Additional issues to address for the constraints_experiments branch?
- From: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- To: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- Cc: metacity-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Additional issues to address for the constraints_experiments branch?
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:54:57 -0800
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 15:37 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 11/14/05, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> > There are 3 intuitive ways to break this into rectangles (which you
> > listed), none of which satisfy the property I listed before ("a window
> > fits onscreen if and only if it fits in _one_ of these rectangles").
> I realized I was being a bit sloppy with my wording here and may have
> misled for anyone reading closely enough. The clarified wording would
> be "a window fits in the region if and only if it entirely fits in at
> least one of the rectangles". (The difference in wording is due to
> the possibility of overlap with these minimal spanning sets; it is
> possible to have a window that can fit into either of two or more
> different spanning rectangles. The key is that if the window doesn't
> fit into any of the spanning rectangles, then it couldn't possibly fit
> into the region).
> - Elijah
I could say something here about shaped windows, but I don't want you to
start crying :-)
] [Thread Prev