On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 12:24 +0000, Andrea Veri via RT wrote:
Dear German and Carlos, the GNOME Membership Committee is about to process Roberto Majadas's application to become a GNOME Foundation Member and therefore we would like to receive some feedback about the applicant and his GNOME-related work. (past and present contributions are usually fine) Please remember that vouching for a contributor means you really think he deserves to be a Foundation Member and that you trust the applicant and their work for the global GNOME community. If unsure about vouching or not, please let us know why you don't feel enough comfortable in advocating this applicant.
Dear Andrea, I endorse Roberto Majadas's renewal because of his contribution to GNOME as well as his passion for our project. In the last couple of years, Roberto has worked in Nanny, an application for parental control in the use of computers. He also has served as director of GNOME Hispano, which is a non-profit organization based in Spain to promote GNOME in Spain as well in Latin America. GNOME Hispano helps with the organization of GUADEC-ES (a Spanish version of GUADEC).
For further details about the applicant, feel free to have a look at the applicant's application at the following link: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/membership-committee/2011-February/msg00016.html
Nevertheless, I think it would a good idea to encourage him to be a bit more verbose in his future renewal applications. (I added him in the Cc, just to let him know :-) Carlos and I might know what Roberto does, but it does not necessarily means that everybody are aware of his contributions. And given the archives are public, it does not make any harm to be a bit more verbose on what we do. Regards, -- GermÃn PÃo-CaamaÃo http://www.gnome.org/~gpoo/ ---------------------------------------------------- This message was sent via GNOME.org Request Tracker.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature