Re: Need to Renew

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 21:53 +0200, Baris Cicek wrote:
> Hi Bastien;
>
>
>
> > Did anybody re-read the mails? It lasts 2 years, was done 3 years ago so
> > "no need to renew". That's an interesting conundrum :)
> We definately should re-read. That sentence left there from template
> mail. Sorry for this inconsistency. I hope rest of the mail and subject
> as well clarify that you needed to renew at that time. 

I got it, all done :)

> Thanks for structural and grammatical corrections. Next time we will pay
> more attention to contents of mails we send automatically. 

No worries, it's just pretty embarassing otherwise. Hurried mails to
mailing-lists are alright, but when it gets to dozens of people...

Cheers

-- 
Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>