Re: Replacement for "merge non-conflicting"?
- From: Bálint Réczey <balint balintreczey hu>
- To: Mitchel Humpherys <mitch special gmail com>
- Cc: meld-list <meld-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Replacement for "merge non-conflicting"?
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 08:21:55 +0200
2014-09-30 21:40 GMT+02:00 Mitchel Humpherys <mitch special gmail com>:
On Thu, Sep 18 2014 at 01:32:25 PM, Kai Willadsen <kai willadsen gmail com> wrote:
On 16 September 2014 07:26, Mitchel Humpherys <mitch special gmail com> wrote:
Looks like a recent update removed the "Merge non-conflicting" item from
meld's "Changed" menu. I thought "Merge All" would be the equivalent
option but it always seems to result in not doing "the right thing" like
"merge non-conflicting" did. Is there a replacement workflow for "Merge
non-conflicting" followed by manually resolving the remaining conflicts?
"Merge All" is just a rename of the menu item. It does exactly the
same action that "Merge non-conflicting" used to do, so if anything
has broken then either it was already like that, or the merging code
has changed. I don't *think* the merging code has changed much
recently, but I'd have to double check.
Hmm, all I know is that I get a bunch of stuff merged to the "middle"
buffer from what I would deem the "wrong side"... In prior versions of
meld it always seemed to do exactly what I expected and wanted it to do.
I'm not sure when this changed but this is what I'm seeing with meld
3.12.0.
I noticed the change in 3.12.0, too, but unfortunately I have already uploaded
3.12.0 to Debian unstable and it has migrated to testing.
I use meld very often for back-porting changes from active Wireshark branches
to old ones and meld 1.8.x did what I considered a minimal
back-porting preferring
changes from the left as I remember. Meld 3.12.0's Merge All started preferring
changes from the right which may make sense in some scenarios but breaks my
use case, too.
I can provide real-life test cases if needed, but they are far from
minimal ones. :-)
Cheers,
Balint
If you have a sample bad merge, please feel free to file a bug.
Here's an example using git with meld as the mergetool:
$ mkdir /tmp/melddemo; cd /tmp/melddemo
$ git init
$ seq 10 > test
$ git add test
$ git commit -m init
$ git checkout -b change1
$ sed s/5/pizza/ -i test
$ git commit -am pizza
$ git checkout master
$ sed s/5/feast/ -i test
$ sed s/1/one/ -i test
$ git commit -am one
$ git merge change1
$ git mergetool # use "Merge All" here
$ git diff --cached
Here's how the final `git diff --cached' looks:
$ git diff --cached
diff --git a/test b/test
index e6a96e7447..8411a685ce 100644
--- a/test
+++ b/test
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-one
+1
2
3
4
-feast
+pizza
6
7
8
9
-one0
+10
As you can see, my `one's got reverted back to `1's even though the
stuff being merged in (change1 branch) didn't touch those lines at all.
In prior versions of meld only the conflicting stuff would have changed
and the `one's would have been left alone.
Maybe this is specific to using meld as a git mergetool (which I would
imagine is a very common use case for meld)?
--
Mitch
_______________________________________________
meld-list mailing list
meld-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/meld-list
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]