Re: Happy 20th Birthday!
- From: Egmont Koblinger <egmont gmail com>
- To: "Yury V. Zaytsev" <yury shurup com>
- Cc: mc devel <mc-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Happy 20th Birthday!
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:14:07 +0100
Hi Slava, Yury, others,
I'm not a native English speaker either and hence often my intent doesn't go through clearly. In no way did I mean to blame anyone for mc development slowing down, quite the opposite, I'm so grateful for you guys maintaining this really essential piece of software! I just wanted to point out that probably it's time to think about ways to boost up development. I totally understand that people's motivation in maintaining the software fades out through the years as they have fixed the major issues, and their personal lives have moved forward.
I myself don't maintain any code the way you do (taking responsibility), I'm just one step behind, being a contributor here and there, and I'd like to remain in this position (which may or may not include git access). I'm happy to fix some pet peeves of mine, maybe I'd fix a bit more than that if I had commit access, but I'm not the one who'll systematically go through the bugs and fix the important ones one by one. (E.g. just for one, personally I hardly care about VFS.)
Also, a couple of disagreements between me and some maintainers recently makes me wonder if it would work out if I had commit acces... I mean, I really wouldn't want to go against the decision of other members, there'd still need to be an agreement among us.
I'm glad to hear that you'd welcome me in the team... but some annoyances, e.g. last time me having a firm "no" vote for the 4.8.13 release and yet it being released (without any discussions) makes me wonder if the twose two guys who went ahead with the release really would welcome me. I think the normal tendency is that you begin to submit valuable contributions, the team starts to recognize and appreciate to you and listen to what you say, and after a point they grant you access. I'm glad you'd give me commit access, but some other developers have not yet reached the point where they'd listen to my arguments -- I wonder if it could work this way or the situation could be changed. I really don't know.
Another example is #3250 where a complete reimplementation of the viewer brings a minor regression in the least used feature, while fixes many noticeable bugs. If I had commit access, I'd go ahead and commit it. But I hear voices that claim a new minor regression as a price for many important bugfixes is unacceptable. So what now? I don't know.
As for the "logistics": I'm not a chat/irc guy, I prefer bugtracker conversations, or occasional chat/irc (but then preferably skype) if there's something specific to discuss interactively.
As a side note, I just started a new job recently, so I won't have too much spare time nowadays.
Anyway, I'm glad I could at least start a conversation. Let's keep it alive and think about possible ways to boost up development :)
cheers,
egmont
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]