Re: mc startup with single specified path
- From: Egmont Koblinger <egmont gmail com>
- To: Mike Smithson <mdooligan gmail com>
- Cc: "mc-devel gnome org" <mc-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: mc startup with single specified path
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:48:42 +0200
Please start with looking around in the bugtracker or compiling the
development version next time :) The issue is already fixed for the
forthcoming 4.8.11.
egmont
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Mike Smithson <mdooligan gmail com> wrote:
Hello.
I'm having some puzzlement over the initial startup behavior of mc-4.8.10
when paths are specified on the command line.
To quote the manual:
[quote]
If both paths are specified, the first path name is the directory
to
show in the left panel; the second path name is the directory to
be
shown in the right panel.
If one path is specified, the path name is the directory to show in
the
active panel; current directory is shown in the passive panel.
If no paths are specified, current directory is shown in the
active
panel; value of "other_dir" from panels.ini is the directory to
be
shown in the passive panel.
[/quote]
Paragraph #1:
This seems correct and intuitive.
Paragraph #2:
What I *expect* to happen when I specify only one path on the command line,
is for that directory to appear in the left panel with the focus on it. As
it works right now, it appears to be random which panel it shows up in, and
which panel has focus. I know that it depends on the last time I hit "Save
Setup" and the setting of current_is_left in panels.ini, but it always seems
to do the wrong thing. As a matter of fact, the behavior I'm witnessing, is
that that specified directory appears in the *inactive* panel, and the CWD
appears in the *active* panel. I think that is counter-intuitive, a bit
annoying, and exactly *not* what the manual says.
Paragraph #3:
This also seems correct and intuitive. Resort to default behavior if nothing
is specified.
---
I believe the issue is in midnight.c, static void create_panels(), around
lines 619-624 and 646-651, both bits are identical, and they shouldn't be:
[code]
else /* mc_run_param0 != NULL && mc_run_param1 ==
NULL */
{
/* one argument */
current_dir = NULL; /* assume current dir */
other_dir = (char *) mc_run_param0;
}
[/code]
Is it just me, or does this seem *exactly* backwards?
I've changed these bits like this (the 1st is when the left panel is
active):
[code]
--- midnight.c~ 2013-08-02 11:02:40.000000000 -0700
+++ midnight.c 2013-10-16 13:59:48.541659334 -0700
@@ -619,8 +619,8 @@ create_panels (void)
else /* mc_run_param0 != NULL && mc_run_param1
== NULL */
{
/* one argument */
- current_dir = NULL; /* assume current dir */
- other_dir = (char *) mc_run_param0; /* Wrong. */
+ current_dir = (char *) mc_run_param0; /* Left panel gets the
path */
+ other_dir = NULL; /* assume other dir */
}
}
else
@@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ create_panels (void)
/* one argument */
current_dir = NULL; /* assume current dir */ ;
other_dir = (char *) mc_run_param0; /* Left panel gets the path
*/
+ boot_current_is_left = TRUE; /* make left panel active (user
called it, there must be a reason.) */
}
}
[/code]
and it now behaves the way I would expect.
After doing a bit more research, it looks as if create_panels() was freshly
re-written for 4.8.10. In 4.8.9 I see this bit:
[code]
if (mc_run_param0 != NULL)
{
current_dir = NULL;
other_dir = (char *) mc_run_param0;
}
else
{
current_dir = NULL;
other_dir = mc_run_param1;
}
[/code]
Hmmm... Is it even possible to have mc_run_param1 *without* mc_run_param0?
Also, what if both are set? No wonder it got re-written.
--
Peace and Cheer
_______________________________________________
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]