Re: ncurses or slang



Hi!

I like ncurses: the versions with full Unicode support are available on
vintage distros like RHEL4 & RHEL3.
 
-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 16:45 +0300, Slava Zanko wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Michail Vidiassov wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > what is the preferred screen output library in the
> > upcoming mc 4.7 and current pre2?
> > I.e. if one can install both ncurses and slang2 on his system
> > what mc is to be compiled against, what branch is developed and tested
> > more active, where are bugs fewer and features more abundant?
> 
> Preferred to S-Lang (as default), but Ncurses fully supported too.
> 
> With NCurses we have some restrictions (like trouble with drawing of
> double lines for boxes). S-Lang is a more powerfull library.
> 
> 
> WBR, Slavaz.
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFKuiZZb3oGR6aVLpoRAviQAJ9snqSZJUffhfNVdiGDiiHWLVOSJwCfc3Qs
> 5Gg8kR9pytv7FeWg2d2JlF8=
> =Qn5O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Mc-devel mailing list
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]