Re: [Midnight Commander] #118: savannah: cannot specify port number in shell link
- From: "Ticket System" <tickets midnight-commander org>
- To: slavazanko gmail com, weigelt metux de
- Cc: mc-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Midnight Commander] #118: savannah: cannot specify port number in shell link
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:11:07 -0000
#118: savannah: cannot specify port number in shell link
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: metux
Type: enhancement | Status: testing
Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7
Component: vfs | Version: 4.6.1
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: vote-styx vote-metux committed-master
Blocking: | Blockedby:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by metux):
* keywords: vote-styx vote-metux approved => vote-styx vote-metux
committed-master
* status: accepted => testing
* resolution: => fixed
Old description:
> Original: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18042
>
> ||Submitted by:||Palo Simo <palos>||
> Submitted on:||Tue 17 Oct 2006 12:51:17 PM UTC||
> ||Category:||VFS||Severity:||3 - Normal||
> ||Status:||Ready For Test||Privacy:||Public||
> ||Assigned to:||Andrew V. Samoilov <sav>||Open/Closed:||Open||
> ||Release:||current (CVS or snapshot)||Operating System:||All||
>
> Discussion:
> {{{
> Mon 30 Oct 2006 08:11:45 PM UTC, comment #4:
>
> Thank you for the patch, it is working okay, great!
> I do not use any of the other options, so I don't know if they are
> affected - I think you know whether or not ...
> Palo Simo <palos>
> Mon 30 Oct 2006 12:04:54 PM UTC, comment #3:
>
> > Do I understand correctly that a port number can be combined with C or
> r? And does one have to specify a port number if one uses 'r'? Please
> explain any syntax changes that you introduced.
>
> No. Look at utilvfs.c:vfs_split_url().
> No one syntax change. Only undocumented behaviour changed.
> It is possible to use /#sh:user host:6789 right now.
> And fish uses port&1 as 'C' option and port&2 as 'r'.
>
> Possible solution is to use 0x10000<<1 and 0x10000<<2 instead of 1 and 2.
>
> > From what I remember from earlier investigations to separate out the
> port from the other options we need to add an extra variable to some of
> the functions. Am I mistaken?
>
> You are right.
>
> > Maybe it's best first to decide on a new option syntax that allows all
> combinations and then implement that new syntax?
>
> I am not sure we can allow such redesign because of lack of manpower.
> Andrew V. Samoilov <sav>
> Project MemberIn charge of this item.
> Sat 28 Oct 2006 12:43:20 PM UTC, comment #2:
>
> > Weakness: port number
> > and r and C option cannot be used together.
> > Port 1 will be interpretted as 'C' option, port 2 as 'r'.
>
> Do I understand correctly that a port number can be combined with C or r?
> And does one have to specify a port number if one uses 'r'? Please
> explain any syntax changes that you introduced.
>
> From what I remember from earlier investigations to separate out the port
> from the other options we need to add an extra variable to some of the
> functions. Am I mistaken?
>
> Maybe it's best first to decide on a new option syntax that allows all
> combinations and then implement that new syntax?
> Leonard den Ottolander <leonardjo>
> Project Member
> Fri 27 Oct 2006 12:15:02 PM UTC, comment #1:
>
> Hello, Palo.
>
> Please test attached patch. This changes have to be documented in manuals
> before commit to CVS.
>
> vfs/ChangeLog:
>
> * fish.c: Iterpret SUP.flags as port number if SUP.flags is not in 0,
> FISH_FLAG_COMPRESSED and FISH_FLAG_RSH. Weakness: port number
>
> and r and C option cannot be used together.
> Port 1 will be interpretted as 'C' option, port 2 as 'r'.
>
> (fish_open_archive_int): Change for above.
> (fish_fill_names): Likewise.
> Andrew V. Samoilov <sav>
> Project MemberIn charge of this item.
> Tue 17 Oct 2006 12:51:17 PM UTC, original submission:
>
> this is a feature request:
> include the ability to specify port number to connect to in the shell
> link to machine feature
> }}}
New description:
Original: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18042
||Submitted by:||Palo Simo <palos>||
Submitted on:||Tue 17 Oct 2006 12:51:17 PM UTC||
||Category:||VFS||Severity:||3 - Normal||
||Status:||Ready For Test||Privacy:||Public||
||Assigned to:||Andrew V. Samoilov <sav>||Open/Closed:||Open||
||Release:||current (CVS or snapshot)||Operating System:||All||
Discussion:
{{{
Mon 30 Oct 2006 08:11:45 PM UTC, comment #4:
Thank you for the patch, it is working okay, great!
I do not use any of the other options, so I don't know if they are
affected - I think you know whether or not ...
Palo Simo <palos>
Mon 30 Oct 2006 12:04:54 PM UTC, comment #3:
> Do I understand correctly that a port number can be combined with C or
r? And does one have to specify a port number if one uses 'r'? Please
explain any syntax changes that you introduced.
No. Look at utilvfs.c:vfs_split_url().
No one syntax change. Only undocumented behaviour changed.
It is possible to use /#sh:user host:6789 right now.
And fish uses port&1 as 'C' option and port&2 as 'r'.
Possible solution is to use 0x10000<<1 and 0x10000<<2 instead of 1 and 2.
> From what I remember from earlier investigations to separate out the
port from the other options we need to add an extra variable to some of
the functions. Am I mistaken?
You are right.
> Maybe it's best first to decide on a new option syntax that allows all
combinations and then implement that new syntax?
I am not sure we can allow such redesign because of lack of manpower.
Andrew V. Samoilov <sav>
Project MemberIn charge of this item.
Sat 28 Oct 2006 12:43:20 PM UTC, comment #2:
> Weakness: port number
> and r and C option cannot be used together.
> Port 1 will be interpretted as 'C' option, port 2 as 'r'.
Do I understand correctly that a port number can be combined with C or r?
And does one have to specify a port number if one uses 'r'? Please explain
any syntax changes that you introduced.
From what I remember from earlier investigations to separate out the port
from the other options we need to add an extra variable to some of the
functions. Am I mistaken?
Maybe it's best first to decide on a new option syntax that allows all
combinations and then implement that new syntax?
Leonard den Ottolander <leonardjo>
Project Member
Fri 27 Oct 2006 12:15:02 PM UTC, comment #1:
Hello, Palo.
Please test attached patch. This changes have to be documented in manuals
before commit to CVS.
vfs/ChangeLog:
* fish.c: Iterpret SUP.flags as port number if SUP.flags is not in 0,
FISH_FLAG_COMPRESSED and FISH_FLAG_RSH. Weakness: port number
and r and C option cannot be used together.
Port 1 will be interpretted as 'C' option, port 2 as 'r'.
(fish_open_archive_int): Change for above.
(fish_fill_names): Likewise.
Andrew V. Samoilov <sav>
Project MemberIn charge of this item.
Tue 17 Oct 2006 12:51:17 PM UTC, original submission:
this is a feature request:
include the ability to specify port number to connect to in the shell link
to machine feature
}}}
committed-master
changeset:a1b47185c952e9d31607d59420a0cb86e9f492ab
--
--
Ticket URL: <www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/118#comment:4>
Midnight Commander <www.midnight-commander.org>
Midnight Development Center
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]