Re: ["PATCH"] Re: Mailfs date problem

[Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov gmx net>]

On Fri, 26 May 2006, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

> Attached file is a replacement for mailfs. Please test. It parses the
> dates back to 3 elements. Used ranges are estimates that are slightly
> larger than the ranges used by file_date, but this avoids overly complex
> equations and file_date parses them back to a "correct" representation
> anyway.

I've noticed another issue . You use the following command:

  date "+%Y %m %d %h"

I guess you meant %H and not %h. %h yields according to the man page
the "locale's abbreviated month name (e.g., Jan)".

Pavel "The Prick" Tsekov