Hello Pavel, On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:59:04 +0200 Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov gmx net> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, wwp wrote: > > > Hello Pavel, > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:59:25 +0200 Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov gmx net> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:14 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > > > Hi Jindrich, > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:48 +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote: > > > > > > 1. "Ok" sets the parameters only for the current session and won't > > > > > > touch the ini file. > > > > > > > > > > "Ok" is equivalent to "save" if "auto save setup" is set. > > > > > > > > ... and if you exit from mc rather than e.g. close the xterm window. > > > > And if you don't have another mc running that would overwrite those > > > > settings if you exit from it properly. > > > > > > > > I think that "auto save setup" is something that cannot be implemented > > > > reliably in mc unless you make "Ok" work exactly like "Save" and save > > > > changes immediately. > > > > > > I think this is a reasonable approch. If we go that way we can safely > > > remove "Save setup" and auto_save_setup. > > > > That means that you would not be able to modify some options w/o saving > > them (and thus, affect all further instances)? > > Hmm... This is a strong indication that those options do not belong to the > Options menu, IMO. If I'm not wrong there are options set outside from the Options menu/dialogs that get saved, like user mini status in listing mode, I didn't feel uncomfortable w/ that. Anyway, maybe the simple way would be the best, and would be smth like only keeping a "Save options" menu entry that users must explicitely use. I must admit that I'm a little bit lost now in the discussion.. ;-) Regards, -- wwp
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature