Re: mcslang2

[Leonard den Ottolander <leonard den ottolander nl>]

Hi Bart,

On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 09:13 +1200, Bart Oldeman wrote:
> just wondering, but why do you intend to keep two internal versions of 
> slang? As slang2 is backwards compatible with slang1 (except for a few 
> details that don't affect mc) it seems simpler to just upgrade the contents
> of the slang directory?

I was just being cautious. We could include the second tree and test it
while people who like to take a more conservative approach can stick
with the first. Once everything works as expected we can always drop the
first tree.

(I noticed the prompt getting invisible on a panel toggle with mcslang2.
Not sure if this is caused by the usage of slang2 or the fact that I ran
mc from the build directory.)

> And, no, -lslang2 doesn't make sense. It's just -lslang for both slang1 
> and slang2.

Right. Thanks :-) . That solves the discussed issue. The discussed hunks
can thus be dropped. Any other breakage in my patch?

Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research