Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy asplinux ru>]

Leonard den Ottolander пишет:
> > In the glibc shipped from RH I found interesting defines about removing 
> > this dependence.
> Any pointers (which files)? What exactly is it's bearing on this case?
> Isn't removing the dependency enough?

> > Another case (after described here by Jindrich) may be same as in glibc.
> Which case?

I mean the next lines in glibc.spec file

...

%define __find_provides %{_builddir}/%{glibcsrcdir}/find_provides.sh
%define _filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE 1

...

cat > find_provides.sh <<EOF
#!/bin/sh
/usr/lib/rpm/find-provides | grep -v GLIBC_PRIVATE
exit 0
EOF
chmod +x find_provides.sh

...

Another words, this provides is present in shipped glibc. And we can
resolve symbols when start application. But no package is provided
GLIBC_PRIVATE and rpm can't install package correctly.

--
With best regards,
Andy Shevchenko.      mailto: andriy asplinux ru