Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)
- From: Leonard den Ottolander <leonard den ottolander nl>
- To: Jindrich Novy <jnovy redhat com>
- Cc: MC development <mc-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:29:30 +0100
Hi Jindrich,
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 22:22 +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> __libc_enable_secure is not a function, but int.
Oops. Fixed the Changelog.
> The fix:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/mc/mc/slang/slcommon.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
> that is done is a bad hack that just confuses a reader of code, please consider
> removing references to __libc_enable_secure completely.
AFAICT it's not unusual to fix such issues with a minimal diff. I could
remove the entire block, but I might just wait for this to be fixed
upstream.
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]