Re: Addressing MC stagnation.

Hi Pavel,

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 03:20, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > I would suggest if such a step would be made we use the MC_4_6_1_PRE for
> > this. HEAD is somewhat experimental.
> I disagree.  We would confuse everybody.  The 4.6.1 branch should be
> released as 4.6.1 if at all (maybe as 4.6.2 if there we unofficial 4.6.1
> releases).
> It's the experimental code that should become 5.0 or 4.7 or whatever we
> choose.  If it's too unstable, we could make some prereleases.

?? Aren't you saying what I'm saying? MC_4_6_1_PRE should become
mc-4.6.1 and HEAD should be used for the release of 4.7 (the viewer code
is not well tested so I believe it shouldn't be used for 4.6.1). Where
do we disagree?


mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]