Re: mc-4.6.1 release?

[Roland Illig <roland illig gmx de>]

Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Roland,
>
> On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 00:52, Roland Illig wrote:
>
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2003-June/msg00005.html
> >
> > I have fixed this with:
> > - #if defined HAVE_MEMPCPY || defined _LIBC
> > + #if 0 && (defined HAVE_MEMPCPY || defined _LIBC)
>
>
> Where exactly did you apply this and does it affect other platforms than
> Cygwin? Seems like a rather crude hack to me.

line 8246

I would rather consider it a bugfix around a crude hack. After querying 
HAVE_MEMPCPY you have no guarantee that you have the function __mempcpy, 
and in portable programs you should not try to call it then. And even 
then, the __mempcpy version saves only one or two assembler instructions 
compared to the non-__mempcpy version. The semantics are the same in 
both branches.

Roland