Re: vfs/extfs/uzip ?
- From: Pavel Roskin <proski gnu org>
- To: Standa Opichal <opichals seznam cz>
- Cc: mc-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: vfs/extfs/uzip ?
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 21:49:40 -0500 (EST)
Hello!
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Standa Opichal wrote:
> I'm not sure that the uzip script should depend on the paths where the
> unzip and other needed binaries are found on the build machine. Is it
> intentional? Why?
See this thread:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2002-November/msg00105.html
Please do your own research. You are asking why I did something, but if
you checked what was there before, you would see that it was much worse.
The same applies to vfs_uid.
Do you think that the hardcoded path was better? Or you have some other
solution? Can you check if your solution wasn't already used in the past
and later rejected?
I think it's a common practice to use configure to find paths to binaries.
The same has been done with awk for a long time, and I don't remember any
complaints.
If you wonder why unzip needs to be called with full path, ask the author
of that script. It wasn't my idea.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]