Re: Pixel photos

[Andreas Nilsson <lists andreasn se>]

On 07/11/2013 10:56 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> Guys, one of the *only* things that a lot of people get in FOSS in 
> return for their work is attribution.
> I told you who the photos were by, I did not say that they were in the 
> public domain, the least you could have done in your press release is 
> attribute. Completely ignoring the fact that most works not in the 
> public domain is *not cool*.

Whooops!
This was a oversight from me. I'm terribly, terribly sorry. Shit. It's 
fixed now.
Again, thank you for doing these amazing photos on such a short notice. 
I really appreciate it!

> This is not the first time this has happened. A photo of mine was used 
> for the Desktop Summit news post: that photo was licensed under CC-by 
> and I was not attributed. The Foundation therefore breached the 
> license which makes the Foundation liable.

Not impossible that this was my fault as well. I will apply myself 
better in the future.


> For the text:
> - high-definition *and touch support*

I was about to add that, but realized it didn't say anywhere in the 
article about the touch support. It does in the image though :)


> - Intel donated only 5 laptops, not 6
> - …Wayland as a result *of* this donated…

Fixed!

> I strongly recommend that you list who received the laptops, who they 
> are working for and what they are working on for transparency reasons. 
> If you do not want to do it in the news article, I will blog about it 
> as it is not currently publicly available, which is not particularly open.

The idea is that these machines will rotate around.
You have a good point about transparency though and I could add to the 
article in who's custody they are right now though, to make clear that 
we didn't give them to the mob or so.
Is the list below solid?
- Andreas