Re: 2012 Annual Report

[Sriram Ramkrishna <sri ramkrishna me>]

I think in the meeting we were talking about doing a report after a conference.

In general, we should roll all this into a quarterly report, and then the annual report would be a summary of the quarterly ones, no?

sri

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Karen Sandler <karen gnome org> wrote:

On Thu, February 14, 2013 8:37 am, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the annual report should be as timely as possible - so covering
> FOSDEM 2013 is great!
>

My mistake - I guess it was pretty late when I did that :)  I'd love to
collect the content now for next year though and find a way to also
publish that separately so we've got current stuff coming out too...

karen

> Cheers,
> Dave.
>
> On 02/14/2013 02:25 PM, Juanjo Marin wrote:
>> On 14/02/13 13:01, Fabiana Simões wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> On 14 February 2013 02:51, Karen Sandler <karen gnome org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe everyone could add links to content on that wiki page? It's a
>>>> really
>>>> easy way to contribute in a small way. I went ahead and linked some
>>>> easy
>>>> ones, like the GUADEC photo pool. But there's a lot of great stuff
>>>> there.
>>>> Whoever takes on the article will appreciate having the links already
>>>> there...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Added links there to as much content as I could find.
>>> One question: The FOSDEM links there are for the 2013 event instead of
>>> the
>>> 2012 one. Is that correct?
>>>
>>
>> I think is just a mistake. We should cover FOSDEM 2012 for this issue of
>> the annual report.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>     -- Juanjo Marin
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Neary, Lyon, France
> Email: dneary gnome org
> Jabber: nearyd gmail com
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
>


--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list