Hi all!
I suppose that people who will say that yesterday was better there will be always a galore, everywhere.
I personally believe that we don't have to regret about this or about a bad article, but "to use" the attention a journalist has regarding GNOME to ask her/him, in proper way, to write something correct.
A wrong article depends from a lack of informations, and very often journalists made a weird job. But this marketing team could help them giving infos :)
my two cent :)
Flavia
Da: marketing-list-bounces gnome org
A: "Dave Neary" dneary gnome org
Cc: marketing-list gnome org
Data: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 15:23:55 +0100
Oggetto: Re: GNOME in the press - 2012-12-05
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:56:05PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > On 12/05/2012 11:05 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > >On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:57AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > >>LinuxInsider.com: "Return of the King: GNOME 2 Is Making Its Way
> > >>Back": http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Return-of-the-King-GNOME-2-Is-Making-Its-Way-Back-76753.html
> > >
> > >WTF. An article consisting of opinions of people on slashdot and sites
> > >such as "Linux Rant" as well as random people on Google+?
> > >
> > >This aside from getting the basics wrong. It was not about getting
> > >"GNOME 2" back.
> >
> > I just copy & paste links from Google Alerts which are not about
> > garden gnomes (actually, garden gnome articles outnumber GNOME
> > articles by about 2 to 1).
>
> It is nice to keep track!
>
> > Perhaps we should blame the journalist for not doing his research -
> > he'll know better next time.
>
> s/his/her/
>
> Just really surprised about the lack of research. I think we could do
> way better with announcing decisions, but if the few decisions which we
> announce are reported like this, then it is pretty logical if people get
> upset.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Olav
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
