Re: first draft of my response to Linux Format magazine
- From: Stormy Peters <stormy gnome org>
- To: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri ramkrishna me>
- Cc: mclasen redhat com, GNOME Marketing List <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: first draft of my response to Linux Format magazine
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:09:11 -0700
I too think you did a great job!
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna
<sri ramkrishna me> wrote:
For the most part, a GNOME 2 application can exist in a GNOME 3 environment. We continue to maintain the same GTK+ api from GTK+ 2 although they are deprecated while providing newer API for application programmers to use. The advantage is that applications developers can move to GNOME 3 at their discretion. This is in contrast to the GNOME 1.x to GNOME 2.x where we broke all APIs and application writers had to re-write their applications from scatch.
I think I would remove "we broke all APIs and". It will still say the same thing.
Stormy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]