Re: redifining GNOME office.

[klyttle <krislyttle gmail com>]

I came across a presentation app for Gnome called Agnubis (strange name, I
know).

Not sure if it's still active, though; I really hope is it...it's definitely
the "missing link".


Ken VanDine wrote:
> 
> That would be fine with me, I just want to get all the areas covered.
> The major week point is the lack of a presentation app.
> 
> --Ken
> 
> On 4/4/07, Quim Gil <qgil gnome org> wrote:
>> Why don't we do the opposite: close officially GNOME Office and keep
>> working on the interoperability and integration between GNOME
>> applications.
>>
>> Do we need a concept of "Office" for GNOME nowadays? There is a lot of
>> people working in offices with computers in the XXIth century, and
>> they use all kinds of applications.
>>
>> For instance, who could strongly disagree if someone would propose a
>> GNOMEish Office suite made with
>>
>> Epiphany - Evolution - Gaim - Abiword - Gnumeric
>>
>> The sensible combinations are multiple, who are we to decide what is
>> Office and what is not? Also important: without MS Office and its free
>> clone OpenOffice, would we be discussing now about GNOME Office?
>>
>> I agree the tools should be integrated, but this principle is
>> applicable to (at least) all the products of the official GNOME
>> release. No need to remark a weak "Office" concept to work on actual
>> functionality.
>>
>> --
>> Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org
>> --
>> marketing-list mailing list
>> marketing-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
>>
> -- 
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/redifining-GNOME-office.-tp9839222p23107807.html
Sent from the Gnome - Marketing mailing list archive at Nabble.com.