Re: GNOME vs Windows
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: Stormy Peters <stormy gnome org>
- Cc: GNOME Marketing List <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME vs Windows
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:10:24 +0100
On 9 Oct 2008, at 21:20, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Stormy Peters schrieb:
3) Access to developers, forums, mailing lists, etc when you have
problems
I would describe that as a user and developer community. This includes
people are meeting all over the world in real live - which is rarely
happening on Windows (more often with Mac users)
7) ....
I would add:
* Security - The platforms on which GNOME primarily runs are more
secure against attacks from the internet
* Viruses and trojans are less of a problem, also
* add-free software and less spyware (especially important for
business
workstations)
Off the top of my head, I would also add Localisation and
Accessibility. GNOME is translated into languages that Microsoft are
unlikely ever to care about. And assistive technologies on Windows
cost $$$. (E.g. the basic version of JAWS, one of the more popular
Windows screenreaders, costs $895.)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com GNOME Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]