Re: Gnomefiles.org

["Eugenia Loli-Queru" <eloli hotmail com>]

Thank you for the reply.

For now, I would like to a fix for this page:
http://www.gnome.org/softwaremap/
that wrongly says that we "do not clearly identify some software that is not 
free or open source." This is not true you see, we made more prominent the 
difference in the license in 2006 when the Gnome guys of the time asked us 
to do so in this very mailing list.

Then, maybe a link somewhere more prominently would be good, because now a 
user has to click 3 times to get to the page that links to our site, and 
that's from a page that has way too many links anyways. Maybe a more 
prominent link somewhere would do the job, there's no need for a full banner 
IMHO.

thanks,
Eugenia



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" <diegoe gnome org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:35 PM
To: "Eugenia Loli-Queru" <eloli hotmail com>
Cc: <marketing-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Gnomefiles.org

> On 6/18/08, Eugenia Loli-Queru <eloli hotmail com> wrote:
> > Gnomefiles.org, the only GTK-only software repository out there, is 
> > dying:
> > http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2008/06/16/the-slow-death-of-gnomefiles/
> >  I need your help.
>
> My humble opinion is that if there's no issue regarding content or
> tech details, we should:
> - update the text $somewhere (please remind us Eugenia) to correctly
> state what's to be found in gf.o
> - put a promo link somewhere in gnome.org (maybe a banner?)
>
> I can't think right now of ways to enhance interaction between both
> sides, but that's because it's 1 AM here, and I'm a bit sick.
>
> If there's some problem with this, or if you have any other ideas,
> please raise your hand and mail your opinion.
>
> greetings everyone,
>
> Diego