Re: redifining GNOME office.

["Ken VanDine" <ken vandine org>]

That would be fine with me, I just want to get all the areas covered.
The major week point is the lack of a presentation app.

--Ken

On 4/4/07, Quim Gil <qgil gnome org> wrote:
> Why don't we do the opposite: close officially GNOME Office and keep
> working on the interoperability and integration between GNOME
> applications.
>
> Do we need a concept of "Office" for GNOME nowadays? There is a lot of
> people working in offices with computers in the XXIth century, and
> they use all kinds of applications.
>
> For instance, who could strongly disagree if someone would propose a
> GNOMEish Office suite made with
>
> Epiphany - Evolution - Gaim - Abiword - Gnumeric
>
> The sensible combinations are multiple, who are we to decide what is
> Office and what is not? Also important: without MS Office and its free
> clone OpenOffice, would we be discussing now about GNOME Office?
>
> I agree the tools should be integrated, but this principle is
> applicable to (at least) all the products of the official GNOME
> release. No need to remark a weak "Office" concept to work on actual
> functionality.
>
> --
> Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list