Re: Epiphany release notes



Hi Claus,

Op di, 05-09-2006 te 01:23 +0200, schreef Claus Schwarm:

No mentioning of Firefox. Maybe we can use the following line in the
release notes?

 "You can now check the spelling of the text entered in the Epiphany web
browser, when it is built with a Firefox 2.0 (or equivalent)
back-end."

Or "Epiphany now uses the latest technology from Mozilla.org to let you
check the spelling of text entered in the web browser. The spell checker
needs a Firefox 2.0 (or equivalent) back-end to work."

Sounds better? I don't think we should be getting any deeper into
technical details...

Btw, Epiphany is mentioned a second time in the backends section as one
of the GNOME applications that switched to the new printing dialog.

Right, I hadn't noticed that.

I know I won't make friends with the next sentence but honestly: I see
no reason to give Epiphany more space in the release notes *this
time*. :-(

Well, I can see how it's reasonable to allocate more space to components
with more visible new features. It's just that web publishing space is
cheap :) However the release notes should not be so long that people
give up reading half way. Do you think that would be the case?

important. Since I have problems to understand the first item in
your release notes, I'm only good enought to represent an outsider
point of view.

OK, so maybe that part needs rephrasing too. What it means is that, in
contrast to previous versions, the back-button-history is preserved in a
new tab or window when you open it from a link on some webpage. Say that
you've visited sites A, B and C and are now viewing site X. Site X
contains a link to site Y but you decide you'd rather view site Y in a
different tab. You could copy the Y address to the clipboard, paste it
in the address bar and press Ctrl+enter to have it open in a new tab
(this functionality was polished in 2.16 too, by the way). Then the
history under the Back button for site Y is empty. But you could also
right click the link to Y and select 'Open in new tab'. Then sites A, B
and C will now be available in the back-history of site Y as well as
site X.

regards,

--
Reinout van Schouwen



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]