After the fruitful thread about gnomefiles.org... a proposal for some conclusions. - gnome.org needs a GNOME Software Map showing at least the official GNOME applications. We need to cook this map ourselves. As a pragmatic approach we can start listing the applications that are included in GNOME 2.16, being a good resource to be linked from the release notes. - At some point someone will come complaining that their application is not on the list although it is like official, mature, widely shipped, etc. We will need the famous checklist to certify official GNOME applications, but this won't be a challenge for the current release and, in fact, is not a debate the web team should start, nor lead. In case of real need we can consider increasing the list including projects active in the GNOME cvs and bugzilla, that have got some kind of official GNOME recognition. - In the GNOME Software Map we will feature at least a link to gnomefiles.org, with the comments we feel needed. We can also include their feed, or maybe we find the way to have a feed with only free apps if we think this is appropriate. - We can develop a more complex and automated software map and we can study other ways of collaboration with gnomefiles.org... but these goals would be discussed in future releases. These steps would be feasible for the current release and would solve an old big problem of the current gnome.org site. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part d'un missatge, signada digitalment