Re: The relation with gnomefiles.org
- From: "Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: "Eugenia Loli-Queru" <eloli hotmail com>
- Cc: marketing-list gnome org, murrayc murrayc com
- Subject: Re: The relation with gnomefiles.org
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:53:40 +0200 (CEST)
> As I wrote to the email the marketing-list that hasn't got through yet (I
> can't seem to be able to register with this list), this is to be fixed.
> For
> example, a non-OSS license will be displayed in italics, in red color and
> maybe a popup window explaining that this is not open source. I am not
> sure
> how more clear I can make it without changing the existing DB...
Excellent. Thanks.
>>For instance, "VM Player" is listed, confusingly as
>>"freeware", and "VMware" is listed as "commercial".
>
> Actually both are correct. VMWare is commercial (or was when it was
> entered
Almost nothing is not "commercial". And "commercial" tells me nothing
about whether or not the software is either free(dom)/open or proprietary.
> in the DB) and VMWare Player is freeware.
"freeware" is not a clear term. It can easily be confused with "free
software". It is not necessary to be unclear.
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]