RE: [libxml++] patch to allow building without glibmm



On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 11:09 -0500, Browder, Tom wrote:
> I second the motion.  As the current caretaker of libxmlwrapp, I'm
> probably going to recommend to users to migrate to libxml++ when it
> loses its dependencies on the glibmm chain.

The patch would be for people who want to build from source, such as for
embedded systems. Most applications would depend on distro packages that
use the default, where of course glibmm is easily available.

Murray





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]